Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Your 100 Fan Club
Your 100 Fan Club The more seasoned I get, the more streamlined I appear to need my life. That is the reason I mitigated FundsforWriters throughout the years from four pamphlets, to three, to two. . . furthermore, presently one, much the same as I began years back. More opportunity to compose. More opportunity to have a good time while composing. I love losing myself in a story. Be that as it may, showcasing, distributing, etc will in general divert us and deny us of the delight. Atâ a late gathering speaker, I addressed essayists about corralling all the to-get things done on their plates and figuring out how to concentrate on composing. I recommended they do what Im doing. . . compose for their most enthusiastic 100 fans. You know who those are. They are the ones who survey, who react to your blog, who speak with you on Facebook, who like your Instagram posts. They dont simply state they love your work, yet they talk it, naming characters and plot focuses that impacted them. Why only 100? Since those are your concentrated portion of vitality. You have a superior vibe for what they like. Since theyve reached you by one way or another, you feel a couple of degrees closer to them. You owe them more, and thusly, they convey back with surveys, messages, and that quite valuable verbal exchange to others about you and your accounts. Just your composition. Compose the narratives that you think your main 100 will cherish. Dont have 100? On the off chance that you continue showing up face to face, via web-based networking media, recorded as a hard copy visitor posts on sites, that 100 will appear. On the off chance that you continue composing and quit counts on one book. In the event that you continue reminding the couple of you have in a bulletin who you are (abstaining from saying BUY MY BOOK), that 100 will occur. Who doesnt feel warm and comfortable having 100 fans? Furthermore, that number becomes quicker the more you take into account that clan. Theyll basically spread the news for you.
Saturday, August 22, 2020
Friday, August 21, 2020
The Excessive Appetites Theory of Addiction
The Excessive Appetites Theory of Addiction Addiction Addictive Behaviors Print The Excessive Appetites Theory of Addiction By Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Elizabeth Hartney, BSc, MSc, MA, PhD is a psychologist, professor, and Director of the Centre for Health Leadership and Research at Royal Roads University, Canada. Learn about our editorial policy Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on August 23, 2015 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on January 10, 2018 Zigy Kaluzny / Getty Images More in Addiction Addictive Behaviors Caffeine Internet Shopping Sex Alcohol Use Drug Use Nicotine Use Coping and Recovery According to psychologist and addictions expert, Jim Orford, addictions can best be understood as appetites that have become excessive through a psychological process. This is a very different perspective from the traditional view of addictions as being primarily driven by an addictive substance that is consumed, such as alcohol, cocaine, or heroin. Jim Orfords approach to understanding addiction was first developed in 1985, with the publication of his ground-breaking book, Excessive Appetites: A Psychological View of Addictions. The second edition of the book was published in 2000. The Key Idea The central idea of the theory is that addictions are types of extreme appetites, rather than forms of dependency on drugs. The five core appetites he identified in the theory are drinking alcohol, gambling, drug taking, eating, and exercise. These examples are chosen as the clearest and best-documented examples of the phenomenon of addiction, all being common and not problematic to many people, but excessive and troubling when strong attachments to them are developed in a minority of people. While the excessive appetites perspective recognizes alcohol and drugs as addictions, they are seen as examples of addictions, rather than capturing the whole experience of addiction per se. In fact, according to this view, the dramatic problems associated with drug addictions have actually clouded our understanding of what is really going on with addictions. Rather than being a purely physiological process, the excessive appetites theory of addiction explains addiction as a complex psychological process, involving a large number of contributing factors. Rather than being a purely physiological process, the excessive appetites theory of addiction explains addiction as a complex psychological process, involving a large number of contributing factors. Factors Involved in the Excessive Appetites Theory The idea that addictions are excessive appetites is different from previous theories in two key ways. Firstly, addiction is described as a largely psychological process, rather than a physical disease. Secondly, addiction can occur in response to a wide range of different behaviors, not just to alcohol and other drugs, which predominate work on addiction. The excessive appetites theory of addiction is one of the strongest and clearest arguments for the existence of behavioral addictions, such as gambling addiction, food addiction and exercise addiction, which are specifically included and explored in the theory. Other behavioral addictions acknowledged include sex addiction, internet addiction, television addiction, video game addiction, and various other compulsive behaviors. He also mentions problematic behaviors such as shoplifting and joyriding as potential addictions. However, perhaps surprisingly, the originator of the theory, Jim Orford, argued against his concept of addiction being extended so far as to dilute the concept, and thereby diminish its importance. While critics of the theory have reduced the idea to absurd levels, as if to invalidate the idea, the suggestion that you can be addicted to everyday activities which have no negative consequences, such as tennis playing or crosswords, is actually missing the point entirely -- the whole point of the theory is that there are negative consequences that cause harm to the individual or to those around them. The person who has an addiction may or may not like the activity, and it is not the liking or disliking that makes it a problem. It is the indulgence of the activity to the degree that it hurts people, and yet the behavior persists, even when the person wants to stop, that is the problem. The 9 Best Online Therapy Programs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)